With Heart, You Can Lift a 1000 Pound Cow or Defeat 61 Enemy Planes in Aerial Combat even if Blind in One Eye

October 6, 2023

Drucker wrote: “Living in fear of loss of job and income is incompatible with taking responsibility for job and work group, for output and performance.” But how can you avoid fear of job loss and loss of income when both are real possibilities in your situation?  

 

A highly successful Broadway musical of the 1950’s, Damn Yankees, suggested that winning was always possible with “heart.” This blockbuster was based on a book The Year the Yankees Lost the Pennant , by Douglas Wallop. In this book, a fictitious Yankees team, dominated  major league baseball . It was challenged by another fictitious, but less successful Washington, DC team. A song in the Broadway musical promoted “heart” as more important than baseball skill.

 

Here’s the song as performed in the musical:

 

The Washington team eventually beat the “unbeatable” Yankees.

 

Drucker’s Analysis


You must acquire any traits yourself before you can instill them in others. Drucker knew only one sure way to acquire heart and the self-confidence that resulted.

 

Everyone starts out in life having to accomplish some difficult acts in infancy. Yet as adults they are not remembered as being difficult or even think of them as much of a challenge today.


Unless you have an injury which you haven’t yet overcome, there is no longer any doubt that when you stand, advance one leg and then another, that you are going to move forward, and when you open your mouth, you can communicate easily. Those who have impairment of these skills usually learn to accomplish them again. Even with the most serious disabilities, most overcome these limitations even with artificial limbs.


Adults have a right to expect to be able to learn and succeed with complex and challenging tasks. But they may not be successful for one of two reasons. Either he or she  has been unsuccessful at similar tasks or projects in the past or has never tried to accomplish the tasks at all previously. Those who have never tried a task at which they don’t expect to succeed frequently haven’t tried because they feel that they would fail if they did try. But I know they can do them because they’ve already accomplished more challenging tasks years ago by just learning to walk and talk.

 

Learning to Crawl First


How many infants have you heard of that simply hopped out of their cribs and began to walk and run? I haven’t heard of any. The typical sequence is that an infant learns to roll over, begins to crawl, gains self-confidence enough to stand up, gains a little more self-confidence and without instruction takes a step and falls. But the infant  knows that it made a start and will eventually succeed. Usually, the parents are are full of praise and cheer enthusiastically even though the infant may not have managed to take a single successful step. . The attempt is certainly not thought of as a failure, but rather an uncompleted effort, and the infant eagerly tries again. If he or she doesn’t grow up to run a four minute mile, at least running is mastered along with walking.


This illustrates one fact as to why some, including experienced executives, sometimes lack self-confidence to accomplish new things, which aren’t as demanding these early essentials. An infant learning a task frequently has cheering supporters. But even if it didn’t, who’s to say that the first step, even with falling, was a bad attempt? However, as we get older, some others are more judgmental and a few involved may even hope we fail! They criticize us if we make a single mistake. They are not encouraging like our parents as we learned to walk. As a result, we get the idea that it was not a good attempt no matter what the results. It took my youngest son, today a highly successful management consultant and investor, almost two years to learn to talk. I wasn’t worried. I knew that he had heart, and it took Einstein almost four years to master speech!



Gain Self-Confidence through Experience as You “Pay Your Dues”


Many of us eventually become successful almost automatically  and there is nothing wrong with this, except that it is usually a longer process. Basically, you enter your work or profession, do what you are told, work hard, exert effort and are eventually promoted. Some call this “paying your dues.” Your efforts are eventually recognized and rewarded. As you progress, you gain self-confidence. However, with this method you are subject to fate and what tasks are assigned. You usually advance and reach some of your goals eventually, but there is a better way which is more efficient and certain.
 
Take Charge of Your Own Confidence Building


If you have heart and decide to voluntarily take on challenging goals in your own areas of interest, it is much faster than the previous method and you have more control. It is based on the principle of your taking charge and deciding on your own progress and development. This takes heart. You can develop just about anything, physical or mental, by beginning with a small challenge and intentionally building confidence over time as you progress with  self-selected challenges toward a goal you want to achieve. It is related to the slower, “pay your dues” method but it is much easier, less risky and you are guaranteed results since you are not dependent on someone else’s requirements. You decide what you want to do, how often, and when.

 

British WWI flying ace Major “Mick” Mannock shot down 61 planes in aerial combat during his time as an aviator. Unknown to his enemies and medical experts that qualified him for flying, due to an injury, he was partially blind in his left eye. But this didn’t stop him.

 

How did Mannock succeed? He proceeded  purposefully toward goals that he set for himself despite his handicap. In Japan this process is known as “kaizen.”

 

Drucker noted that: “Every artist throughout history has practiced ‘kaizen’.” You will be a top producer if you pick your own goals for your development and if you work on developing these talents further.” If you want to get physically strong, exercise your muscles every day, and every day they’ll grow bigger, and your strength will increase.


Arnold Schwarzenegger didn’t start out with those powerful muscles that led to his winning bodybuilding championships and eventually to becoming the top paid actor in Hollywood and then Governor of California. By exercising with increasingly heavy weights, his muscles got larger and stronger until eventually he was world champion.


In bodybuilding, this didn’t start with Arnold. Milo of Croton was a champion Greek athlete and Olympic competitor in the 6 th century B.C. He participated in six Olympic games four years apart. Before the first, he began an exercise which brought him strength, self-confidence, and eventual fame throughout the ancient world. Milo lifted  and carried a newborn calf weighing about 80 pounds. He continued every day for four years before the Olympics began. By the Olympics started, the calf was a full-grown cow weighing 1000 pounds. Milo carried the cow the length of the Olympic stadium, creating a spectacle which not only demonstrated his strength and self-confidence, but discomforted his competitors and created a psychological advantage.


Though the calf weighed only 80 pounds when he started, when he carried the same calf four years later, it had grown into a 1000 pound cow. Milo’s feat was noted in several books written about him during his lifetime.


Now I’m not suggesting that you begin lifting a calf which will become a fully grown cow to develop your self-confidence, although this would undoubtedly do the job. But the principle works for other accomplishments in your own field. All you need to do is to make the decision and begin to set goals in an area of your interest, and then to do them. Select an easy goal to begin and proceed as you successively accomplish more difficult goals. Every time you complete one, congratulate yourself. Your heart and self-confidence are taking you to success.


This is how Arnold trained with weights. He increased their poundage as the calf increased body weight. Arnold further increased the difficulty of the exercises as his muscles and strength developed. Because he had heart, his ability and capability as well as his confidence increased and like Milo, Schwarzenegger eventually did things that others, maybe even he, never thought he could do when he started. If you follow his plan, you too will have acquired the strength and  self-confidence you need to succeed in whatever you desire, and like Governor Schwarzenegger, Milo of Croton, Major Mannock in World War One, and many others, this can take you to great levels of success in whatever your interest or occupation.


By Bo Yang, Ph.D. January 31, 2026
Peter Drucker’s memoir, Adventures of a Bystander, is a self-portrait of a most unusual kind. It reveals its subject not through direct autobiography, but through a series of incisive portraits of the people he encountered throughout a tumultuous life. Drucker positions himself as a "bystander," but this is no passive observer. Instead, he is an intellectual portraitist whose careful study of others becomes the very method by which he comes to understand himself and the fractured world he inhabited.
December 17, 2025
This essay was inspired by an article recently published by Karen Linkletter and Pooya Tabesh (2025). They were in search of the meaning of “decision” in the works of Peter Drucker. To this end, they used Python to identify and locate all the times the word, “decision”, came up in Peter Drucker’s oeuvre . They then characterized the contexts (“themes”) in which the word came up. The result was a nuanced but very clear characterization of the evolution of his thinking on the topic. Here, we will focus on a key theme for Drucker: the case where your decisions involve other people’s decisions and actions . For present purposes, we can start with their statement: One of Drucker’s valuable contributions to the literature on decision-making is his adamance that implementation be built into the decision-making process.” (Linkletter and Tabesh 2025 8) To be clear, “…it is not a surprise that his integration of implementation of and commitment to decisions is part of his process of decision-making. He argues that a decision “has not been made until it has been realized in action.” (2025 8) The question, therefore, is how to make this happen, how to turn an organization from an aggregate of individuals whose decisions may or may not be aligned, into an agent—an entity that makes decisions, implements them, and then ascertains that what was done was, in fact, what was decided, as we try to do when making purely individual decisions. Let’s look at the matter more closely… A few years ago, I read a story about a road crew that was painting a double-yellow line on a highway. In their path was a dead raccoon that had been hit by a car or truck. It was lying right in the middle of the road. The crew didn’t stop. Someone later took a picture of the dead raccoon with a double-yellow line freshly painted right over it. The picture is below. It went viral on the Internet.
December 17, 2025
When Paul Polman became CEO of Unilever in 2009, he did not inherit a troubled company. He stepped into a large global enterprise with familiar consumer brands that sat on shelves in cities from Amsterdam to Manila. Even with that scale and reach, the business rested on foundations that were beginning to crack. Public faith in multinational firms was fading, climate change was moving from a distant worry to a financial reality, and investors were increasingly locked into the rhythm of quarterly results that encouraged short term decisions and discouraged real strategy.
December 10, 2025
Peter Drucker suggested that readers view his first three books as a unified body of work: The End of Economic Man(1939), The Future of Industrial Man (1942), and Concept of the Corporation (1946). These works share a common theme: politics. Drucker did not think about politics like scholars who strictly follow modern social science norms. Instead, he viewed politics as part of social ecology and understood political events through the dynamic changes in social ecology. Despite having "corporation" in its title and using General Motors as a case study, Concept of the Corporation is indeed a book about politics. In this work, Drucker attempts to address the main issues that industrial society must resolve: the legitimacy of managerial authority, the status and function of managers and workers, and the power structure of society and organizations. In Drucker's own words, this is a book exploring the specific principles of industrial society. Corresponding to these specific social principles, Drucker had earlier attempted to develop a general social theory, which was the aim of The End of Economic Man and The Future of Industrial Man. The subtitle of The End of Economic Man is "The Origins of Totalitarianism." The book focuses on how society disintegrates in industrial societies and how totalitarianism rises. For Drucker, the real challenge of this topic isn't explaining how Hitler and Mussolini came to power, nor the actions of Germany and Italy in government, military, and economic spheres. Rather, it's understanding why some Europeans accepted clearly absurd totalitarian ideologies, and why others seemed potentially receptive to them. Drucker's writing style is argumentative. He clearly knew that to effectively advance his arguments, he needed to engage with popular theories of his time. Back then, there were two main explanatory approaches to Nazism and Fascism, which Drucker termed "illusions." Some viewed totalitarianism as ordinary political turmoil similar to previous historical revolutions. In their view, totalitarianism was characterized merely by cruelty, disruption of order, propaganda, and manipulation. Others considered totalitarianism a phenomenon unique to Germany and Italy, related to their specific national characters. Drucker thoroughly refuted explanations based on "national character." He believed that any historical approach appealing to "national character" was pseudo-history. Such theories always emphasize that certain events were inevitable in certain places. But all claims of "inevitability" negate human free will and thus deny politics: without human choice, there is no politics. If the rise of totalitarianism were inevitable, there would be no need or possibility to oppose it. Viewing totalitarianism as an ordinary revolution is equally dangerous. This thinking merely emphasizes how bad Nazis and Fascists were. But the real issue is that Europeans were not merely submitting out of fear—they were actually attracted to totalitarianism. And those attracted weren't just the ignorant masses but also well-educated intellectual elites, especially the younger generation. The world cannot defeat totalitarianism through contempt alone, especially if that contempt stems from ignorance. Understanding the enemy is a prerequisite to defeating it. Drucker identified three main characteristics of Nazism and Fascism (totalitarianism is a social type, with Nazism and Fascism being its representatives in industrialized Europe): 1. The complete rejection of freedom and equality, which are the core beliefs of European civilization, without offering any positive alternative beliefs. 2. The complete rejection of the promise of legitimate power. Power must have legitimacy—this is a long-standing tradition in European politics. For power to have legitimacy means that it makes a commitment to the fundamental beliefs of civilization. Totalitarianism denied all European beliefs, thereby liberating power from the burden of responsibility. 3. The discovery and exploitation of mass psychology: in times of absolute despair, the more absurd something is, the more people are willing to believe it. The End of Economic Man develops a diagnosis of totalitarianism around these three characteristics. Drucker offers a deeper insight: totalitarianism is actually a solution to many chronic problems in industrial society. At a time when European industrial society was on the verge of collapse, totalitarians at least identified the problems and offered some solutions. This is why they possessed such magical appeal. Why did totalitarianism completely reject the basic beliefs of European civilization? Drucker's answer: neither traditional capitalism nor Marxist socialism could fulfill their promises of freedom and equality. "Economic Man" in Drucker's book has a different meaning than in Adam Smith's work. "Economic Man" refers to people living in capitalist or socialist societies who believe that through economic progress, a free and equal world would "automatically" emerge. The reality was that capitalism's economic freedom exacerbated social inequality, while socialism not only failed to eliminate inequality but created an even more rigid privileged class. Since neither capitalism nor socialism could "automatically" realize freedom and equality, Europeans lost faith in both systems. Simultaneously, they lost faith in freedom and equality themselves. Throughout European history, people sought freedom and equality in different social domains. In the 19th century, people projected their pursuit of freedom and equality onto the economic sphere. The industrial realities of the 20th century, along with the Great Depression and war, shattered these hopes. People didn't know where else to look for freedom and equality. The emerging totalitarianism offered a subversive answer: freedom and equality aren't worth pursuing; race and the leader are the true beliefs. Why did totalitarianism reject the promise of power legitimacy? One reason was that political power abandoned its responsibility to European core beliefs. Another reason came from the new realities of industrial society. Drucker held a lifelong view: the key distinction between industrial society and 19th-century commercial society was the separation of ownership and management. The role of capitalists was no longer important. Those who truly dominated the social industrial sphere were corporate managers and executives. These people effectively held decisive power but had not gained political and social status matching their power. When a class's power and political status don't match, it doesn't know how to properly use its power. Drucker believed this was a problem all industrial societies must solve. Totalitarianism keenly perceived this issue. The Nazis maintained property rights for business owners but brought the management of factories and companies under government control. This way, social power and political power became unified. This unified power was no longer restricted or regulated—it became the rule itself. Why could totalitarianism make the masses believe absurd things? Because Europeans had nothing left to believe in. Each individual can only understand society and their own life when they have status and function. Those thrown out of normal life by the Great Depression and war lost their status and function. For them, society was a desperate dark jungle. Even those who temporarily kept their jobs didn't know the meaning of their current life. The Nazi system could provide a sense of meaning in this vacuum of meaning—though false, it was timely. Using the wartime economic system, the Nazis created stable employment in a short time. In the Nazi industrial system, both business owners and workers were exploited. But outside the industrial production system, Nazis created various revolutionary organizations and movements. In those organizations and movements, poor workers became leaders, while business owners and professors became servants. In the hysterical revolutionary fervor, people regained status and function. Economic interests were no longer important, freedom and equality were no longer important; being involved in the revolution (status) and dying for it (function) became life's meaning. The Nazis replaced the calm and shrewd "Economic Man" with the hysterical "Heroic Man." Though absurd, this new concept of humanity had appeal. What people needed was not rationality but a sense of meaning that could temporarily fill the void. Those theorists who despised totalitarianism only emphasized its evil. Drucker, however, emphasized its appeal. He viewed totalitarianism as one solution to the crisis of industrial society. From 19th-century commercial society to 20th-century industrial society, the reality of society changed dramatically. 19th-century ideas, institutions, and habits could not solve 20th-century problems. Capitalism could not fulfill its promises about freedom and equality, and neither could Marxism. It was at this point that totalitarianism emerged. Nazism and Fascism attempted to build a new society in a way completely different from European civilization. Drucker said the real danger was not that they couldn't succeed, but that they almost did. They addressed the relationship between political power and social power, proposed alternative beliefs to freedom and equality (though only negative ones), and on this basis provided social members with new status and function. The war against totalitarianism cannot be waged merely through contempt. Defeating totalitarianism is not just a battlefield matter. Those who hate totalitarianism and love freedom must find better solutions than totalitarianism to build a normally functioning and free industrial society. Totalitarianism gave wrong and evil answers. But they at least asked the right questions. Industrial society must address several issues: the legitimacy of power (government power and social power), individual status and function, and society's basic beliefs. These issues became the fundamental threads in Drucker's exploration of industrial society reconstruction in The Future of Industrial Man. The Future of Industrial Man: From Totalitarian Diagnosis to General Social Theory Both The End of Economic Man and The Future of Industrial Man feature the prose style of 19th-century historians. Even today, readers can appreciate the author's profound historical knowledge and wise historical commentary. For today's readers, the real challenge of these two books lies in Drucker's theoretical interests. He doesn't simply narrate history but organizes and explains historical facts using his unique beliefs and methods. In The End of Economic Man, Drucker developed his diagnosis of totalitarianism around three issues: power legitimacy, individual status-function, and society's basic beliefs. In The Future of Industrial Man, he also constructs a general social theory around these three issues. In "What Is A Functioning Society," Drucker explains three sets of tensions that exist in social ecology: 
November 15, 2025
Last semester, two students approached me to advise their AI-based graduate projects at a time when no one else in the department was available or willing to take them on. Our department lacked sufficient faculty with software or AI specialization at the time to support the growing number of requests in this area.
November 4, 2025
When Marc Benioff founded Salesforce in 1999, Silicon Valley had a pretty straightforward playbook which was technological disruption at any cost. Profit, scale, and market capture dominated corporate ambition. Benioff, who worked under Steve Jobs at Apple and explored Buddhist philosophy, was not satisfied with that approach. He envisioned a company that would not only revolutionize enterprise software through the cloud but also redefine the social purpose of business itself. His leadership at Salesforce reflects Peter Drucker's concept of Management as a Liberal Art (MLA). This idea holds that management is not just about efficiency or growth, but about making work human, creating meaning, and building institutions that serve society (Drucker, 1989).
November 4, 2025
What is Soft Power?
August 20, 2025
Previously, I shared de Tocqueville’s concept of equality of condition and how it is manifesting in today’s perception that democracy has failed to deliver on its promise of economic and social equality for all. Promises of economic equality are impossible to fulfill; but democratic societies can and should offer all of their members dignity and a sense of purpose. In this final installment, I’ll share de Tocqueville’s prescriptions for shoring up the institutions of a democratic society – as well as some of his warnings about challenges that democracies face.
July 5, 2025
Over the past two decades, there has been a discernible shift in the professional workforce. Increasingly, individuals have chosen to leave traditional corporate environments in favor of smaller ventures, entrepreneurial efforts, and purpose-driven careers. This migration has been fueled by a desire for greater autonomy, meaningful impact, and freedom from the rigidity of hierarchical organizational structures. As the world continues to undergo sweeping changes—economic, technological, and social—professionals are finding themselves at a crossroads. The COVID-19 pandemic only accelerated this reckoning, forcing people across industries to reevaluate their relationship with work, identity, and independence.
June 21, 2025
In Part I of this series, I gave a brief overview of Alexis de Tocqueville’s background and project of evaluating American Democracy in the early 19 th century. In this new installment, I’d like to share de Tocqueville’s observations about the nature of equality in America and how what he saw might help us understand some of the challenges democracies face today.